Peter Klevius wonders how many Communists were murdered during WW2? The least studied subject, right?!

 US and Nazi led Anti-Communism caused most of WW2 casualties. So what about today?

Peter Klevius wrote: 

Sunday, January 27, 2019

Klevius thinks we ought to pay equal attention to the non-Jewish majority who died in the s.c.* Holocaust.

* Holocaust is Greek and means 'whole offering'.

The Forgotten Suffering (Klevius 1992)

 Demand for Resources (Klevius 1992, ISBN 9173288411).

The civilized wo/man walks
back in her/his foot steps,
strikes a light and lets her/himself be enlightened
and glorified
Only the forgotten suffering,
and the shadow behind her/him,
hovering over the future,
are greater

Some 17 Million (est. varies between 12-20) died in the s.c. Holocaust.
According to Wikipedia between half and three quarters of the victims were non-Jews.


Wkipedia's definition etc.:

Most Holocaust historians define the Holocaust as the German state policy, enacted between 1941 and 1945, to exterminate the European Jews.[c] In Teaching the Holocaust (2015), Michael Gray offers three definitions:

    the persecution and murder of Jews by the Nazis and their collaborators between 1933 and 1945; this definition views the events of Kristallnacht in Germany in 1938 as an early phase of the Holocaust;[2]
    the systematic mass murder of Jews by the Nazis and their collaborators between 1941 and 1945; this acknowledges the shift in German policy in 1941 toward the extermination of the Jewish people;[2]
    the persecution and murder of several groups by the Nazis and their collaborators between 1933 and 1945; this includes all the Nazis' victims.[2]

The third definition fails, Gray writes, to acknowledge that only the Jewish people were singled out for annihilation.
Klevius comment: What an insult to non-Jewish Holocaust victims. Singled out but not classified. Most of the world's victims have always been unclassified. This is why they're only recognized if belonging to a certain, often arbitrarily or deliberately, pointed group. And most often just hidden as not belonging to an accepted group. We all do know about the Unknown Soldier. However, the Unknown Sufferer is kept in the shadow of groups.

Klevius defends the individual against group labeling no matter if s/he's a Jew, a muslim, Atheist, Christian, Buddhist, communist, capitalist, feminist or whatever.

And why so low profile and silent about non-Jewish Holocaust victims? BBC's religious Sunday program by BBC's islam loving Ed Stourton about Holocaust allegedly didn't even mention non-Jews. Why?

However, the worst ideological genocide ever was made by islam against s.c. "infidels" who were singled out for slavery/rape and annihilation during 1,400 years. Even the lowest estmates are staggering. And for a start, do read what Lal and other historians have dug out about islamic horror in the past. Christians, communists, National-socialists etc. don't come even close. Or take a look at what Islamic State and other Mohammad and Koran inspired jihad organizations have done in present time.

Klevius repeats the same advise he has been giving since his teenage: Negative Human Rights freedom for the individual against religious or political fascism. Just read the original anti-fascist Human Rights declaration from 1948.

And do note very carefully that islam today via Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC approves of a sharia that violates the most basic of real Human Rights.

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion.

A Google search today on 'victims of islam estimates' produces these strange results:

.

 

 

 

Japan used to be the quality standard of the world - and US the laughing stock. Now China is passing* even Japan.

* Unlike Japan, China doesn't need to import its products from China - or Thailand, Vietnam etc. And we do know that products manufactured outside Japan tend to be slightly less reliable statistically. Moreover, China is already ahead of Japan in top tech such as e.g. AI, quantum computing, fusion energy, smartphones, space tech etc.  
 

However, whereas the middle-man in US may choose between high quality or cheap Chinese tech - the Chinese middle-man doesn't have that choise if buying from US.

 

It took a long time for the dumbest people in Europe to realize the poor quality of US made cars etc. And despite all quality surveys and reports that clearly showed it, it took even more time for them to get it that Japanese cars were better made than German cars.

As a young poor lad Peter Klevius bought the best quality for the lowest price. So how was that possible? Because Japanese cars were simply not in at that time, they were just called "rice cups". So Peter Klevius asked one of his friends who run a garage: I found a beautiful Mazda Luce, and ist cheap and gorgous. Is it any good? He steered in chock and said: But it's Japanese! - So what, is it bad quality or something. Hesitantly he said: I thing quality is OK - but it's Japanese!

So Peter Klevius bought what became by far the best car he had ever had or driven. And when he worked for a company and had to use their big US made car he was scocked to find out how wobbly and dangerous it felt at speeds the Mazda Luce was rock solid on the road. And when comparing the rear drum brakes (Mazda Luce had McPerson and big discs in the front) it turned out that US brakes were just half the size of the Mazda - although the US car weighed almost the double. 

 Btw, Mazda made a huge mistake when "Americanized" it for US export, i.e. except for using a sofa in the front instead of the flexible and safe original seats, also hampered all the charm of the wonderful, extremely long stroke, yet fabulously smooth running engine and a distinct gearbox that made any BMW feel
lousy, with an automatic one that totally killed the car.

Peter Klevius wrote:

Saturday, March 03, 2018

Klevius: What are the "brits" complaining about?

What's your problem? Snow and ice was the funniest time to drive - and not a single accident in any of the long dark Nordic winters. 

Update: Due to a reader's question - no, Klevius almost never used studded winter tires (only for a short time when they came with the car). Non-studded but soft tires with big patterns were by far to prefer if you knew how to drive - not to mention that studded tires could be quite dangerous during e.g. times of thawing, (wet and bare tarmac etc).

 Klevius bought a cheap old very much used 1968 Mazda Luce 1800 when he became a young bachelor with a kid. Except for lacking 4WD it was the perfect winter car: 50/50 weight distribution; jeep style ground clearance, an extremely modern (for its time) OHC long stroke (good torque) but smoothly (idling at 600 RPM) running alu top engine (remember Mazda was also the only one managing to make a functioning rotary engine) that made it possible to use higher gears on slippery conditions; a steering system that was forgiving (to the driver as well as to the icy road) yet still very responsive; an alternator that was the most powerful of any ordinary car back then easily feeding four 55W halogen lamps which could be used as eight by keeping the signal switch on without the unique ampere meter needle on the dashboard (only ordinary car that had one back then?) going into red; the most powerful electric fuel pump (Mitsubishi) that made it easily start when Volvos, Saabs, VWs/Audis etc. stalled in -30 Celsius; big double motors for windshield wipers kept the sight free when passing lorrys and busses on the motoway splashing wet snow; and finally, superb brakes, i.e. modern big discs in the front and smooth oversized drums in the rear, which together with the smooth and powerful (for its time) engine (the car weighed 1050 kg and had 104 longstroke hp) made it possible to smoothly brake like modern cars by combining the clutch and the brakes on icy surface. That the fuel tank was on the safest possible place (behind/below the rear seats) etc. for its time many unique safety features, was just an extra bonus. But the funniest thing was that the car was much cheaper to buy than a lousy used Saab or Volvo because of "Japanese rice cups" racism. Yet the car also looked much cooler than its competitors.And due to superior technical quality, the gearbox/clutch was far better than any BMW (which were lousy winter cars anyway). Moreover, the drive shaft was extremely sophisticated with high quality multi-joints which made for vibration free smooth power delivery to the rear. Etc, etc, etc..

When Klevius was a young newly divorced dad, he drove some 100 km every day to his office job in the city no matter how much snow or ice, leaving and picking up his child, shopping etc. before landing at our countryside home and making a delicious dinner for the two of us. 

 

Youtube accepts creationism but censors Peter Klevius, the world's best anthopologist - as it seems?

Every data fits Peter Klevius out of SE Asia theory but not creationism or "out-of-Africa"* - so why censor?

* In fact, the "out of Africa" hoax fits creationists precisely because Africa lacks transitional fossil. Africa is a fossil dump. 

 

Is it because Peter Klevius also fights for Human Rights for all - and against religious fascism? Or is it because he points out how $-freeloader US has painted itself in a corner because of the 1971 dollar fraud, and now faces losing its dollar hegemony because of China's growth and technology - and therfore also losing its capability to continue stealing from the rest of the world. Not to mention that would mean a huge decrease in its wealth. It therefore also means US is now the main threat to world peace.

 This fake info nonsense video is really in need of a thorough corrections. However, Youtube doesn't allow any correction.

 

Here's Peter Klevius censored comment:

 "Sorry to spoil the party but a continent like Africa was absolutely impossible for the evolution of an omnivorous fast moving bipedal. Look instead at SE Asia's ever-changing tropical island world (Homo floresiensis and Homo luzonensis are the ultimate evidence, but neglected by afropologists) from where they spread to the mainland during ice ages and hybridized with former Homos that had become large and "mongoloid" (cold adapted) in the fat and protein-rich north. In my book Demand for Resources (1992), I was probably the first to point out the connection between the 280,000 BP big "mongoloid" Jinniushan woman (est. 80 kg/180 cm) and Africa's oldest people, the "mongoloid" i.e. cold adapted Khoi-San. And genetics reflects only modern DNA in Africa (we lack usable ancient DNA from Africa), and in SE Asia we can trace most of our hybrid ancestors (Denisovan and Neanderthal) DNA. And we also lack usable fossil from Africa re. Homo transition. As Kimberley said: All we have are ambigious and fit in a shoe box - together with a decent pair of shoes. The easiest place on Earth to find fossils is the opening tectonic crack in east Africa where most hominids and hominines entered Africa - the oldest being in the north and the youngest in the south. And SE Asia is the hardest because most are under water or in jungles. I'm an anthropologist, not an afropologist."

 It looks like Stefan Milo has got his info from Chris Stringer and then spiced it with own cherry picking and projections. However, the final result is as far from reality you can get. See e.g. Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Change direction and every piece of the "puzzle" fits perfectly.

Peter Klevius wonders whether DNA vaccines and RNA wannabe "vaccines" are equally poorly anchored as is the impossible out-of-Africa "theory"?

After a second fact check: Yes, they are!

 When Peter Klevius a year ago had to face the choice of being called an "anti-vaccer" or take a DNA or RNA jab, he settled for a compromise, i.e. a single DNA which he considered the least scary because it was associated with a virus - not naked as the RNA-drug. Nothing has changed since, and although the following was available online as late as 1 June 2021 (Received 24 March 2021, Revised 10 May 2021, Accepted 25 May 2021), it's in line with Peter Klevius understanding of the field a year ago. However, what really scared Peter Klevius was research made long before Covid, which showed that cats injected with RNA "vaccine" died prematurely compared to a control group.

There are known events of adenovirus vector or SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse transcription DNA integration. However, we don't know exactly how rare or what effect they will have in the future.

It's proposed that SARS-CoV-2 infection alone may be associated with integration of viral RNA reverse transcripts, possibly meaning these events therefore could occure in any SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, this is questioned by other research, e.g. 2021 Jul 28, No evidence of human genome integration of SARS-CoV-2 found by long-read DNA sequencing. So the proposed integration may be biased for the purpose of equaling the risk between vaccine and disease on this point.

It's also unknown whether adenoviral gene products could be coexpressed with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein after injection of vector vaccine. Peter Klevius hopes it does if it enters his genome. At least it would then inform that it's not naked but associated. However, that would also mean that it's useless when encountering Covid-19.

At present, we simply cannot assess the possible effects of the DNA-vaccines and the RNA-drug on the human organism, incl. if they are actually expressed. According to pro-vaccer reearcher Walter Doerflera (Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne) 'the opportunities and risks, both at the same time, remain beyond our expectations'. He continues: 'Clinical observations of long-lasting positive RT-PCR test results involving integration of SARS-CoV-2 DNA into the human genome in the course of some Covid-19 cases make apprehensions about vaccine-associated integration events unrealistic compared to the expected benefits of Covid-19 vaccination.'

Peter Klevius summary of the status of DNA vaccines and RNA drugs:

The "expected benefits of Covid-19 vaccination" (sic). Who expected?!
We "cannot assess the possible effects of the DNA-vaccines and the RNA-drug on the human organism".
Risks "remain beyond our expectations".

 

Peter Klevius warning: If you watch this video you may become an "anti-vaccer"*!

 * As Peter Klevius has repeatedly told you, dear reader, Peter Klevius is a coward and didn't want to be called an "anti-vaccer". That's why he a year ago took one single dose of the least dangerous available. Couldn't get a real vaccine like the  Chinese vaccines, and this was before the French came up with Valneva. My reasoning was that Astrazeneca's DNA was at least clad with a real dead cold-(adeno-)virus - not completely naked as the RNA experiments from US.

 

Peter Klevius answer to Joe Rogan's and Robert Malone's question why this is happening: See no farther than China - and now desperate $-freeloader US attempts to stop China's success with whatever means!

 

Dr. Robert Malone interviewed by Joe Rogan Jan 1, 2022 (3 hours)

You mentioned Blackrock and Vanguard, but you could have added that 10 out of the 12 largest are US.

That's what Peter Klevius calls real influencers.

As Joe and Bob correctly stated, these influencers are just seeking gain-of-finance. However, precisely because US isn't a democracy anymore, its government is steered by these influencers. And via US government "allies" are scrambled against China for the purpose of hindering China's growth from pulling out US $-skeletons from the closet built 1971.