Why did Finlad suddenly jump for F35 instead of (as palanned) Swedish Gipen? Because Gripen can't carry US new mini nukes!

 How stupid and dangerous can Finnish politicians be who try to push Finland into US extended nuke army (i.e. NATO)!

 US is 100% to blame for the Ukraine disaster as well.

STOP US (+ its Anglospheric puppets), the worst threat to the world right now!
This monstrous rogue state $-freeloading U.S.:
1. Is adding more than 600 nukes to its already more than 6,000.
Because of smaller size, better transportability, higher accuracy,
and US first strike policy (unlike e.g. Russia, China etc.)
the risk of use of nukes by US has dramatically increased
- especially considering the end of $-hegemony because of China
outperforming it in tech and healthy development.
2. US can at any time read and silence your free speech, or stop your
transaction - wherever you are in the world (except in China).
3. UK/AUKUS bought US mini nukes (e.g. for Trident) and NATO+Finland bought
F35 which can carry them.

Beijing 2022: A bridge over troubled water - beautiful, high quality performance instead of ugly Sinophobic aggression and militarism

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct. 

While China tries to build trust and bridges, the West under $-freeloader rogue state US influence and coersion, keeps spitting and smearing in a racist manner not seen since WW2  against a people!

 

China's Sui Wenjing & Han Cong win pairs gold in Beijing Winter Olympics 2022 to the tune of Bridge over troubled water.

Finland, the motherland of lands

 'Finn' and 'land' are both more than 2,000 years old - and first applied to northern Europe settled by different types of Finns

 Peter Klevius tries to correct the scientific bias that population gravity and PC, rather than essence and honesty, has created.

Get the explanation and history of the above pic here! 

Finland - the motherland* of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Holland, England, Scotland, Ireland etc.

The muslim scimitar against the Western "infidel". Or today, Saudi islamofascism (Saudi based OIC sharia) against Human Rights. This has been made possible by OIC officially abandoning Human Rights in 1990, and EU's s.c. Mediterranean treaty that paved the way not only for an unregulated immigration of muslims from Middle East and Africa, but also for the stifling of criticism against islam (compare OIC's urge to criminalize the new "illness" it had diagnosed and called "islamophobia"). The scimitar on Finland's and Karelia's coat of arms symbolizes the evil of islam - not Russia* (although Ivan was terrible, he wasn't an ideology). Before the appearance of the scimitar trampling lion on the coat of arms of Finland, muslim Tatar warriors (on the pic) carrying scimitars* repeatedly attacked and pillaged the southern coast of Finland with devastating effect on the locals. * Tatars used by Russia (Muscovite) carried Cossack style sabers, not scimitars. Finland's coat of arms (top right) is first known from the 1580s (on Gustav Vasa's tomb in Uppsala cathedral), while the Karelian coat of arms (below Finland's) was seen already in 1562. Uppsala cathedral was built after the Viking age on top of Sweden's original sacred non-Christian site. Uppsala was the natural and closest connection from Finland via the archipelago (see Peter Klevius Finland-Swedish history lesson about Kvenland). The symbol of the lion is derived from the coat of arms of the Folkunga family, and included in the royal arms of Sweden. The beginning of the Folkunga family is said to be traced to Fornjotr, the King of Kvenland and Gotland (ca 160-240 AD). Finland-Swedish Leif Tengström made a desperate 1,000 page long effort in his thesis Muschoviten-- Turcken icke olijk": Ryssattribut, och deras motbilder, i svensk heraldik från Gustav Vasa till freden i Stolbova (1997 - ("The Muscowite, not unlike the Turk" : Russian attributes in Swedish heraldry from Gustavus Vasa [1523] to the peace-treaty of Stolbova [1617]. Diss. -- Jyväskylä University) - trying to disprove a much better Finland-Swedish historian, Matti Klinge, who already 1981 established the scimitar on the weapon as representing muslims. Tengström vehemently opposed this view but after a decade long research he had to admit his failure but covered it up in a charlatanic excuse, i.e. that the scimitar just represented a general western xenophobia against both Russia and islam. In fact, Tatar warriors were all over the place, even fighting for the Muscovites, but they can't possibly have been the prototype for the muslim scimitar on the coat of arms. Tatar muslim warriors were sent to Arabia to learn how to hate "infidels" - and then utilized by a Swedish/Polish king (Sigismund II Augustus) who said he "liked the muslim way of keeping with old customs". Peter Klevius: Reminds me of how the islamofascist Saudi dictator family still today uses the old islamic method of "teaching" hate against the "infidels" (compare Rohyngia jihadis, Sri Lankan jihadis, Uyghur jihadis etc. - or just any Sunni jihadi all over the world.

 

 

If Youtube supports science*, it ought to stop giving free pass to anti-science afropologists who promote grave misinformation about human evolution.

* What's really the differance between (religious?) afropologists and religious creationists? Youtube seems to treat them similarly well.

Peter Klevius has for a decade* told the world that humans didn't originate in Africa - by using the very "evidence" afropologists claim to have.

* And as the world's first 1992 to combine "mongoloid" (cold adapted) Jinniushan with Khoisan. Genetic diversity, fossils (or rather the lack of transitional ones), and "Africa is a big continent" (smaller than Asia and with less variation in climate and ecology - and doesn't possess a tropical and volatile archipelage as the one in SE Asia)!

Genetic diversity of dogs and humans

 Cumulative genepool corresponds with cumulative fossilpool. And species diversity corresponds with immigration of new species over time.
 

When afropologists say there are more genetic diversity in Africa, they simply lump together all migrant DNA from the oldest (Khoisan) to the youngest (Bantu). It's like saying there are more genetic diversity among pet dogs - which we do know has nothing to do with evolutionary origin. Except, of course, as a model for how volatile islands created new species.

Genetic diversity is the total number of genetic characteristics in the genetic makeup of a species, it ranges widely from the number of species to differences within species and can be attributed to the span of survival for a species.

Genetic diversity serves as a way for populations to adapt to changing environments. Asian environment was much more varied than African. And the dog breeding environment was different from the wolves.

Dog breeding started some 40,000 bp, perhaps even earlier, i.e. close to when truly modern humans started conquering the world from Asia some 55-45,000 bp.

If all pet dogs were let loose, we would end up with the same situation as with humans - i.e. answering the stupid question: Why is there only one type of human species left?

The absolute impossibility of African "crdle of humankind".

Sustained reproductive isolation creating true species differences among intelligent, bipedal and omnivorous primates, can only be achieved on unstable islands - meaning they need both island isolation as well as mainland interaction from time to time.

An omnivorous, fast moving and clever bipedal wouldn't give species evolution a chance on a continent. What was needed was repeated island isolation. Just like our diversity of dogs was created on breeding "islands".

Africa's "genetic diversity" rests on migration, because the oldest DNA in now living Africans comes from "mongoloid" (cold adapted) Khoisan who must have come from the north. According to Peter Klevius (who is a real scientist - i.e. bias assassin) theory (first hinted at 1992 and finalized 2012) round-skulled Homo sapiens sapiens (HSS) got a better brain setup in the SE Asian archipelago due to jungle dwarfing where only better packed small brains could survive. During iceages (e.g. after the Toba catastrophe) the new brain setup entered mainland Asia and finally mixed with Jinniushan's relatives in the cold north - and became "mongoloid". This resulted in the clever HSS that the conquered the whole world. However, when Khoisan's ancestors passed the tropics they also mixed with the ancestors of what we used to call "Negritos", "Pygmies" etc.. This mix resulted in small statured people with either negroid or mongoloid features.

All modern humans, except for Australian aborigines - which has its own mixing history with Papua-New Guinea in the past - have identical globular skulls.