Pages

Tuesday, April 5, 2022

What you see is what you get! It's all about $-freeloader rogue state US' effort to get the world against China - and under US dictatorship!


An anti-democrat* and possible war criminal** is given United Nation as his portal. Something the leaders of Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Syria etc. could only have dreamt about!


* Has expelled elected parties.

** A blind eye to neo-Nazis etc. nationalists' atrocities in the long civil war before the invasion. 

As long as we only have extremely unbalanced propaganda but no critical analysis, Peter Klevius feels obliged to question some of the mainly BBC spread propaganda narrative.


United Nations, with its head office already in $-freeloader rogye state US, on the way to be totally incorporated in $-freeloader rogue state US' militarism against China's peaceful belt and road approach.

$-freeloader rogue state US can't care less about Ukrainians and EU - other than as tools for its hegemony and militarism - which is the only means it has left against China's peaceful superiority.

Militant post-Brexit BBC (British Broadcasting Corruption) may be $-freeloader rogue state US' most powerful weapon of war against China. $-freeloader rogue state US couldn't have a better supporter in its evil deeds than BBC which became the lifeline for the tiny Brexit UK's lifeboat on the stormy Brexit ocean that was no empire ocean anymore.

$-freeloader rogue state US' asks EU for not buying Russian energy - while increasing its own import from Russia last week by 43%, so that it could sell "US energy" to EU for a higher price.

Russia wanted to discuss the Bucha allegations at a UN Security Council meeting, but the call to hold one was stonewalled by the UK, which is currently presiding over the top international security body.

The city mayor failed to mention any atrocities as he celebrated the Russian pullout on March 31.

BBC "reported" that the bodies were there when the Russians were there. So what!

Scott Ritter: The main source of the Bucha tragedy reports is a videotape, taken by the Ukrainian National Police, of one of their convoys driving through a street in the town. A dozen or so corpses litter the roadway, many of them appearing to have been bound. This video has gone viral, producing a pandemic of anguish and anger that has swept over much of the world, capturing the attention of heads of state and the head of the Catholic Church alike, resulting in a tidal wave of condemnation and outrage directed at Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin. The cause-and-effect relationship between the video and the global backlash is clear – the former could not exist without the latter.


The video has been released in its present form, it appears, with the express intent of producing a visceral “shock and awe” moment for the viewer. If this was indeed the case, then those who released it – the Ukrainian National Police – have succeeded beyond their wildest imagination. Or that of their advisors, as the case may be.

The linkage between the dead and the Russian military was established immediately, without any fact-based data to back it up, and subsequently echoed in all forms of media – mainstream and social alike. Anyone who dared question the established “Russia did it” narrative was shouted down and belittled as a “Russian shill,” or worse.

Peter Klevius: Ask yourself, whom does this serve the best, Russians or Ukrainians, and who had the most to lose with it? And who could stage it, if indeed it was staged - or were the victims Ukrainian Russians targeted by the neo-Nazis etc. Ukrainian nationalists - supported by Zelensky? Hint, don't ask BBC!

Zelensky distributed military weapons to almost anyone who asked - so how do we know how these weapons were used by ciivilians?

BBC has since Brexit been an extremist warmonering voice over the world while pointing against China.

BBC also happily reported that Zelensky accused Russia of the "worst war crimes since WW2" - without even mentioning Rwanda etc.

Rwanda, btw, is now becoming UK's migrant office. Must be the most remote of its kind, right!

US is now the pest of the world!

 

Monday, April 4, 2022

Is Zelensky a war criminal and also guilty of crime of aggression?


Did Zelensky turn a blind eye to (civil) war crimes and genocide long before the Russian invasion?

"Just wars" are fought only for self-defense or in defense of "allies". How do US and its puppets fit?

Did Zelensky reject peace offers?

 


Is Finland again taking the wrong path?


"Those who "in a significant manner contributed in Finland's engagement in the war...or prevented peace"

"Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing.

Finland's president RistoRyti was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. Along with Ryti, seven other high officials were sentenced to prison, although for shorter terms. The group was convicted using an ex post facto law, which had been instituted for the purpose by the parliament. Although the Finnish constitution prohibited such legislation, the act in question was passed as a constitutional amendment, with a qualified majority in the parliament. Both the court and the parliament faced severe pressure from the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom during the process.


What is definitely clear is that BBC continuously commits crimes against media ethics. However, could this also be seen as a deliberate war crime and crime of aggression?

Media war crimes


BBC's reporting from Ukraine is appallingly senseless in its onesidedness and complete lack of criitical analysis but instead full of "Russians did it" without even the slightest hint about the possibility that the civil war that preceeded the invasion must have left its traces as well.