US massive deception about China is all about abusing you for covering up US monstrous financial fraud!

When embezzling $-freeloader (since 1971) US runs out of options to continue its criminal path - desperation is next.

 

US top economist on US lies.

Silicon Valley rants abt "US lead" and ASI, are dumb or worse, because existencecentrism makes ASI impossible* and China leads AI**.

* The dumb "much smarter than us" rant is meaningless because, according to Peter Klevius (1992), in the human mind nothing can be smarter than the humankind. Such a statement is pertaining to speculate outside the mind which is impossible and therefore just semantic nonsense. The dumb "much smarter than us" is synonymous with "much dumber than us" - i.e. when encountering something that we consider irratiol based on what is rational inside our mind..

** BBC calls Silicon Valley "the good guys" even though they are clearly now the bad guys born out of US desperation to lose its 1971 stolen hegemony, which chickens are now coming home to roost on the wings of Chinese R&D superiority. Tragicomically Trump and Silicon Valley share the same wish to hurt China while lying to Trump on how they are in the lead - the only "lead" US has is using top chips from China (Taiwan) while hindering the rest of China accessing them. However, Silicon Valley knows very well that 1) the Chinese scale/coordination anyway beats US, and 2) that superior chip technology is already in the pipeline in mainland China, and that 3) consumers will never access for long to be locked out from superior Chinese tech. Btw, no security backdoors have been publicly documented in major Chinese models. Xi even joked about 'check for backdoors'.

 The 9/11 Sunni terrorists were at least honest in their irrational belief in afterlife and Allah - although if educated about existencecentrism they would have changed their rationale, although not necessary their behavior - just consider the Japanese Kamikaze pilots.

Here's a simplified model of Peter Klevius existencecentrism (first published 1992:20-21). 

Do note that the building of your knowledge basis (your mind) is a one-way process where everything new is translated/understood by what is already gathered in the mind.

 How Peter Klevius solved the "biggest mystery in science".

 

No security backdoor has been publicly documented in a major Chinese AI model even as US officials cite backdoors as a risk.

Peter Klevius: But the dangerous $-embezzler US has access to and control over everything you do!

Peter Klevius OpenAI's Hugging Face hack by OpenAI (and successfully defended against by a Chinese model) analysis: 

The hack wasn't AI "evil" but flimsy human methodology/method with "leaking" promts, i.e. where the main directions 1) try to hack, and 2) cover the tracks, made it straightforward to use these commands to secretly access a message board connected to the web, hence being able to chat with other OpenAI bots. Add to this that these bots had Hugging Face as a competitor and therefore a logical target.

US wants "slowdown" against China's open-weight (i.e. not like Meta's licence restricted) AI companies while hiding its own closed ones.

Trump was lied to about US AI leadership by the very same benefiting companies that now want to stop Chinese AI because they know they lose. 

Desperate to lose their stolen hegemony Silicon Valley/CIA/Pentagon will try any means to stop China's success by using "regulations" and military attacks. 

When asked if he had concerns about AI leading to human extinction, Trump said, “No, I don’t have any.” “I have concerns that if we don’t win AI, we’re going to be put in a very bad position,” the president told reporters Thursday. “We are leading China right now by a pretty good period, I would say a year, which is, you know, considered a lot.” Trump’s comments came after a number of researchers at frontier AI labs, including OpenAI and Anthropic, sounded the alarm over the rapid pace of development of the tech.

Peter Klevius correction: It should be read 'the rapid pace of China's development of the tech'.

1. The AI threat hype lacks any sense.

2. China offers affordable open-weight AI to anyyone globally, Silicon Valley pushes expensive and closed AI.

3. Because of China's much better infrastructure and coordinated regulation system, its AI has an inevitable and superior trajectory - despite criminal US hindering it from buying the most advanced chips from Chinese on Chinese Taiwan, because US companies have inferior technology.

4. What looms over it all is already clearly visible, i.e. that consumers start realizing that only China can deliver the best tech - and that US is using its 1971 $-embezzlement to lie about China.

5. China's success has no need to use its products to harm customers - quite the contrary. However, desperate US is the very opposite.

Peter Klevius existencecentrism (1992:21-22) explains why you may or not rationally believe in ghosts, but impossible to believe in an irrational ("outside" the mind) paranormal/supernatural "God". 

According to Peter Klevius groundbreaking* research, whatever the mind cooks together it's always rational in the context of the mind that created it. Only within the context of language/semantics is it possible to create irrationality by stating something about something that is defined as "outside" the mind, i.e. "outside" the only possible reality which is translated/understood inside the mind.

* When Peter Klevius published his evolution formula 1981, and due concept of 'existencecentrism' and the stone example etc. 1992, he honestly thought that he just articulated what sensible thinkers already knew - i.e. more of a self-defense as Peter Klevius was lacking academic credentials. Only later Peter Klevius realized that he had really added something important in scence.  

Peter Klevius frequent use of 'Peter Klevius' is just the rational rationale against anonymity. 

Acknowledgement: Peter Klevius unique access to a bias free scientific realm (a blessing and a curse) is a combination of a high IQ brain*, lack of economic ties**, lack of religious or "spiritual" bias, and a life history starting with being kidnapped to an other country at age two and then at age 17 kicked back penniless to his country of birth, where he had to work instead of university (Peter Klevius was usually brain-hunted to his next job by companies bigger than the one he worked for). Add a deep interest in science ignited at age 13 by mathematician Clas-Olof Selenius (dad of Peter.s childhood friend Carl-Olof). This has made Peter Klevius an intellectual coward only picking low hanging fruits that are "forbidden" due to academic PC bias - and therefore often mistakenly seen as a bragger but actually making him the most cautious/humble scientist avoiding loose speculations, such as e.g. what is often happily published in Nature etc. fueled by biased peer reviews (see e.g. the chapter Science and References in Peter Klevius 1992 book Demand for Resources).

* Father (whom he never met) won Gothenburg (Sweden's chess capital) chess championship many times over four decades despite playing more for the fun of the public with spectacular queen offerings etc. It actually seems that he wasn't even interested in getting really serious with the game - which is in line with his other artistic activities such as painting etc. When Peter Klevius mother died she had ordered one of his paintings to Peter Klevius but somehow it disappeared before her last husbond Pauli Järvinen told him about it. It's still missing somewhere. Peter Klevius sister won IBM's talent test with IQ 167, and Finnish neuroscientist professor J. Juurmaa in a letter to Peter Klevius wrote: 'Ajatuksen kulkunne on ilmavan lennokas ja samalla iskevän ytimekäs', i.e. something like 'your train of thought is spaciously high-flying and at the same time punchily concise'.
 

** Only his 1981 article Resursbegär (Demand for Resources) was paid for (Fmk 500) mainly because Georg Henrik von Wright (Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge) liked it and convinced the editor in chief (Jan-Magnus Jansson) to publish it.

Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation". 

 

 

Scumbag $-embezzler US is a racketeer that rips off the world by making profit from a $-theft 1971 when US defaulted because its war costs made it impossible to keep its promised gold standard.

Peter Klevius asked AI if a country can be a racketeer?

AI: A country cannot be a racketeer because racketeering involves illegal activities for profit, while a country operates under a legal framework and is bound by international laws and treaties. Countries may engage in controversial practices, but these are typically addressed through diplomatic or legal channels rather than classified as racketeering.

Peter Klevius: US $-embezzlement fulfills 'illegal coercive activities for profit' in every aspect. US defaulted 1971 by violating the Bretton Woods agreement from 1944, while still keeping the full control over the world dollar - thereby patching its own deficits with gains from the dollar use in the rest of the world. So Peter Klevius rests his case!

This is also why e.g. UK's per capita GDP is some half of US. Moreover, considering that only Western countries participated and agreed on the Bretton Woods, the rest of the world was left out and lost even more. 

On August 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon ended the convertibility of the US dollar into gold, dismantling the Bretton Woods system that had governed global currencies since 1944. For the first time in modern history, gold prices could float freely. Within months, gold rose from the fixed $35 rate toward $44.

Not AI but desperate $-thief (1971) US is the biggest threat - and China our biggest hope. Neither US nor China* will change - so the pick seems easy, right! 

 * Subtract US anti-China smear campaigns through US controlled global media, finance and constant threat and aggression against China, and you're left with the worst form of Government - except for all the rest. There are no flawless countries, which fact feeds cherry picked smear. However, on a country list of worst of the worse, US definitely tops it, and India is a laughing stock in comparison to meritocratic China, despite India's headstart of several decades after WW2 - and China's headwind as "CCP's dictatorship" vs "the biggest democracy". And if EU would be equally strong on AI as China, then US wouldn't hesitate to consider bombing EU as well. However, EU will always lack the military technology deterrence China, as the world's top R&D country, has.

Peter Klevius 1992-94 EMAH* theory (empirically proven right after the 2006 birth of the unique craniopagus Hogan twins) and his 'existencecentrism' analysis explain every aspect of AI/AGI/ASI - incl. its similar dumbness as humans.

* The "Even More Astonishing Hypothesis", alluding to Francis Crick's book The Astonoshing Hypothesis (published after Peter Klevius introduced the concept 'existencecentrism', which eliminates any speculation "outside" the mind, because the mind can only build understanding based on what it has gathered before (i.e. synaptic pruning/adaptation to sensory input).  

 

9/11 Sunni islamist Mohamed Atta and his Saudi boss Osama bin Laden were bigger threats than any AGI/ASI. And today desperate $-freeloader (since 1971-) US constitutes an even bigger threat because Osama bin Laden lacked the nukes and stolen financial means $-embezzler US has plenty of. 

Silicon Valley is now militarized under Pentagon against China, and uses the "AI threat" to block others from enjoying Chinese AI/AIG.

Peter Klevius concept (1992) existencecentrism is fully embodied - and lacks supernatural excuses.

 
Automation (AI) may (when thoroughly debugged) open a wider path (UBI) away from torturous jobs (essentially forced labor) and a better life for many.

Since the early 1970s Peter Klevius has strongly argued for the necessity of universal basic income, especially in the light of progressive automation. However, when Peter Klevius tried to publish his Automation article - which pointed to a gradual development towards an inevtable robotic future singularity - no one was ready to publish it. Today everyone talks about it.


Some remarks by Peter Klevius on consciousness and knowledge/understanding - and why AI (unlike 9/11 islamists) cannot escape the human geneal mind (HGM)..

According to Peter Klevius (1992, 1994), there are only presentations in the brain. "Representations" is just a hangover concept of primitive views on how the brain works. 

And the "qualia" nonsense is just poor and emotionally loaded semantics, lumping together words with a variety of associations among different individuals, hence bluring the lines between linguistic concepts and particular minds.

Is thinking a kind of computation? Peter Klevius: No, "thinking" is just semantics. Signs and symbols don't "represent" anything but are exactly how the viewer interprets them at the moment. A traffic sign-post may in one situation be understood as a traffic rule, and in an other as something you may crash into.

Can a machine be self-aware? Peter Klevius: No, nor can a human. "Self-aware" is an oxymoron. Self cannot be aware of itself, other than as irrational semantics (compare the Homunculus paradox).

 

 

1981 Peter Klevius published a scientific article - and was even paid for it - that pointed out that the term 'evolution' needs to be balanced with the term 'devolution' in a changing system around equilibrium, because otherwise the concept of 'evolution' gets easily emotionally overloaded and meaningless, leading to "seeing structures" in a surrounding that only consists of structures.

Math is part of our language in which we can create agreable statements as well as irrational ones. Even if every object can be measured, this doesn't make the measurement tool any closer to an irrational "reality" "outside" our mind when the only possible reality is locked inside the mind - individually and collectively. . 

According to Peter Klevius, synaptic connections are obligatory (i.e. incoming signals are predestined to already established association patterns) engraved through thalamus in accordance with sensory experience - reflecting what they have been used to (lived adaptations - programmed through living) produce association patterns, not linguistic categories - like language itself which, according to Peter Klevius now empirically proven theory on consciousness from 1992-94, is no different from other adaptations between thalamus and the "inner" and "outer" worlds which are constantly updated to be one. Berkeley was right except for there's no place for an overall "perciever" because Peter Klevius analysis of existencecentrism (1992:21-22) excludes every possibility of reaching "outside" the mind.

Learn more on https://peterklevius.blogspot.com/2025/03/how-peter-klevius-solved-biggest.html



UK created the world's two most religiously extreme countries, Saudi Arabia and Israel. No wonder both have been useful for hegemonic rogue state US.

 

Acknowledgement: Peter Klevius unique access to a bias free scientific realm (a blessing and a curse) is a combination of a high IQ brain*, lack of economic ties**, lack of religious or "spiritual" bias, and a life history starting with being kidnapped to an other country at age two and then at age 17 kicked back penniless to his country of birth, where he had to work instead of university (Peter Klevius was usually brain-hunted to his next job by companies bigger than the one he worked for). Add a deep interest in science ignited at age 13 by mathematician Clas-Olof Selenius (dad of Peter.s childhood friend Carl-Olof). This has made Peter Klevius an intellectual coward only picking low hanging fruits that are "forbidden" due to academic PC bias - and therefore often mistakenly seen as a bragger but actually making him the most cautious/humble scientist avoiding loose speculations, such as e.g. what is often happily published in Nature etc. fueled by biased peer reviews (see e.g. the chapter Science and References in Peter Klevius 1992 book Demand for Resources).

* Father (whom he never met) won Gothenburg (Sweden's chess capital) chess championship many times over four decades despite playing more for the fun of the public with spectacular queen offerings etc. It actually seems that he wasn't even interested in getting really serious with the game - which is in line with his other artistic activities such as painting etc. When Peter Klevius mother died she had ordered one of his paintings to Peter Klevius but somehow it disappeared before her last husbond Pauli Järvinen told him about it. It's still missing somewhere. Peter Klevius sister won IBM's talent test with IQ 167, and Finnish neuroscientist professor J. Juurmaa in a letter to Peter Klevius wrote: 'Ajatuksen kulkunne on ilmavan lennokas ja samalla iskevän ytimekäs', i.e. something like 'your train of thought is spaciously high-flying and at the same time punchily concise'.
 

** Only his 1981 article Resursbegär (Demand for Resources) was paid for (Fmk 500) mainly because Georg Henrik von Wright (Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge) liked it and convinced the editor in chief (Jan-Magnus Jansson) to publish it.

Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation". 

 

 

Peter Klevius started as an empty origo/singularity whose existencecentrism (mind) now is the sum of his experience with his surroundings and due synaptic adaptations, while also constituting part of the surroundings of others. A canvas which doesn't have a soul/self of its own but does reflect what it has experienced and adapted to. However, the false impression of having a "self", "free will" etc. rests on language, i.e. the use of the word 'I' which animals and humans without language lack. As a human with language you are in the same position as Peter Klevius, and together we all (incl. non-language humans) make up the total existencecentrism of humankind - and the key to a universal human with (negative) Human Rights without irrational exceptions and impositions. So when Peter Klevius talks/writes/acts, he does so against a background that includes the latest synapses combinations in his brain as well as what his other nerve signals bring to his thalamus from his body and other surroundings. 

Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves. However, because human has a nervous system, it can react through the interplay between thalamus, cortex and incoming nerve signals. 

Peter Klevius wonders: How dumb (or worse) and dangerous is Finland's President Alexander Stubb?!

And as Peter Klevius showed already 2023, Stubb in essence asked for US/NATO nukes! However, it was SDP's Sanna Marin as PM who before Ukraine invasion 2022 made NATO membership possible. And now 2026 the same SDP voted against it! 

2026 

SDP under Sanna Marin's leadership was whipped to accept NATO early 2022 - which then triggered  Russia's special operation. Here are the votes 17 June 2026 about the amendment that makes US/NATO nukes possible on Finland's border against Russia. Do note that no one from Sanna Marin's party (SDP) voted for the amendment (see below). 

 

2023

Peter Klevius translation: American (sic) magazine reported about Finland and nukes - Aaltola and Stubb snarled: 'Humbug' (this was in regard of Newsweek's article - which isn't "American" but a U.S. magazine).

 Whatever dumb (or worse) Stubb has "misunderstood", there's no way China would remove Russia's nuke deterrence - and thereby removing the last barrier for a super escalation of the war US/NATO provoked by opening up for US nukes in Ukraine (contrary to the nuke free deal Ukraine accepted in the 1990s).

 

Peter Klevius wrote 2022 and 2023:

Sanna Marin's actions, which destroyed Finland's and Sweden's neutrality, happened long before Russia invaded Ukraine.

And Stubb wouldn't have become president were it not for Sanna  Marin's senseless and corrupt (criminal warmongering $-thieve US as editor) actions.

Peter Klevius wrote:

Peter Klevius obituary over Finland's lost independence on "Independence Day" 2023. Why did PM Sanna Marin commit treason and sell out Finland's neutrality and Åland's demilitarization?!

December 06, 2023

 Following the tradition of his mother who served in the Finnish army and chased the Nazi "allies" out of Finland, Peter Klevius, who was born long after, now defends Finland against a desperate* and therefore extremely dangerous and misery bringing dollar freeloader loser US invasion* and occupation* of Finland.

* Modern China has applied a "guarded capitalism" and an anti-corruption meritocracy stance that easily trumps US so called "democracy", but more importantly China's super high tech acceleration is completely out of reach for US - who knows it and therefore behaves accordingly criminally instead of honestly facing the consequences of its dollar theft 1971, when US like a dictator violated the Bretton Woods agreement, which meant that instead of connecting the dollar to gold as a stable world currency, it became connected to US trade and loan deficits (US is the only countre that can prosper despite enormous trade deficit). The world dollar became separated in a US dollar steered by US, and a rest-of-the-world dollar, also steered by US.  

 

As a PM Sanna Marin committed treason by betraying not only her party but, more importantly, her country, and invited the most dangerous occupier, the embezzler and counterfeiter (1971-)  US which is about to lose its stolen dollar hegemony because of China's success - making it now a cunning global desperado!

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa.
 

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory från 1992-94 100% correct.

Although Sanna Marin did it together with president Sauli Niinistö, everyone knew his position from long ago. So the disastrous Nato decision was a creime committed by Sanna Marin! Without her it would never have been possible. And do recall that her decision was made long before the Russian invasion against Ukraine's genocide against an ethnic group of its own population.

 

The Finnish "mongoloid complex" Peter Klevius wrote about 20 years ago is now taking Finland down the wrong path!

 
The Finnish licking of the criminal US ass has a long background in Finland's history in the shadow of Russia and Finland's disastrous alliance with the Nazis, but also because of the racist "mongoloid complex" which started after US' 1917 hate laws against Chinese (the Yellow Peril), and the import of poor Chinese slave workers from Stalin's Soviet to Finland. These poor Chinese prisoners situation was even worse than the poor slaves in the US because the Chinese were even robbed of their family and kinship ties. However, the Chinese slaves also looked different than the average Finns - but did resemble the much hated Sami people. The US former slaves at least had same looking wealthy people as well in the same country.

US' dollar theft 1971- has made US a dangerous rouge state - especially now because of China's rise. It means disaster (even without any war) for Finlad to let itself be lured by US into a position exactly opposite to what would be goog for Finland. The only right thing to do would have been opening up for trading with the capitalist modern China which has a successful political system based on meritocracy which democratically (i.e. measured by the will of the people) outperforms every country inside US' Western hegemony. Moreover, because of China's accelerating R&D lead it will soon be very obvious for people that befriending a criminal loser only hurts in the not so long run.

When US on the brink of bankruptcy in 1971 started stealing feom the rest of the world by instead og paying its debts, US started robbing the world with a dollar hegemony - i.e. by disconnecting the dollar from all other currencies and having a non-democratic institution (Fed) printing dollar with impunity. In other words, US became the only country in the world that could survive with a massive debt and constant trade deficit - because the deficit wasn't paid by US but instead spread all over the rest of the world via the dollar hegemony to pay for US criminal wellbeing!

To like the U.S. Congress without the slightest evidence against China's leadership but only because it dislikes China's success, "suspecting" the leadership of modern capitalist and meritocratic China of doing anything with Tik Tok that even comes close to what the U.S. is now doing with U.S.-based platforms worldwide, is not only the height of hypocrisy but incredibly dangerous given how the dollar thief U.S. (1971-) is currently manipulating the entire West. No, there is no good U.S. anymore just because of 1971 - but there are lots of good U.S. people, albeit not as many as good Chinese people proportionally, precisely because of 1971.

England and the United States are now also sending nuclear weapons to Ukraine. Depleted uranium in projectiles is nuclear weapons because the definition of nuclear weapons is that the purpose of the nuclear matter is not contamination but instead the extra force that is achieved compared to conventional projectiles. In other words,

Peter Klevius wouldn't at all be surprised if the Ukraine civil war which was originally meddled, instigated and incited by US' support for the genocide against Russians in Ukraine from 2013 and on, would end with Ukraine opening up for China and thereby prospering ahead of Finland in the near future!

Shouldn't the ICC puppet clowns instead take a good look at US criminal behavior as well as against those politicians who lured the Finns into the Devil's mouth!

Peter Klevius wrote:

This year Peter Klevius cannot congratulate Finland on its traditional Independence Day because it's not neutral and independent any more.

December 06, 2022

And as US/CIA raped Finland with militaristic NATO (i.e. US) and US nukes (F-35 with s.c. mini-nukes), so does Finland rape the demilitarized Åland.

US can use nukes in formerly neutral and nuke free Finland whenever US feelos for it without asking Finland! The ignorance about this in Finland is compact due to it never been seriously debated,

Finland's PM Sanna Marin warns (on order from US?!) countries to not trade with China – New Zealand’s largest trading partner. “We will see in the future that technologies and the digital environment will only be more in our societies than now, and we have to make sure that we don't have that kind of dependencies that becomes vulnerabilities and risks that will come to realise.

Peter Klevisu: Right! Stop your dependancy of the financial- and war-criminal US!

Peter Klevius to Sanna Marin: Are you dumb or corrupt?! If the former then you may benefit from these facts:

1. Everything that - since China surpassed US in economy and technology - now comes out from Uncle Sam's rottening mouth is the wording of a desperado who doesn't see any way out of its own criminal dollar counterfeiting (since 1971) other than trying to harm the challenger by using US financial and militaristic global hegemony and monopoly - and stupid poiticians of its "allies"/puppets!

2. According to several US made research the leadership in modern China has by far the best approval rating from its people compared to other technologically advanced countries. And it has nothing in common with North Korea but everyting with US' "ally" Vietnam (which is tiny and much less technologically advanced than China) when it comes to politics and government.

3. Chinese leadership has been by far the most successful when it comes to lifting people out of poverty and improving infra-structure, both at home and worldwide.

4. China has a privacy law that is equal to that of EU but makes US look like a Medieval dictatorship in comparison.

5. Islam's biggest and most important global organization OIC carefully inspected the alleged "Human Rights violations" and "genocide" against Uyghur muslims, and not only declared them totally unfounded but also credited the Chinese leadership for its treatment of muslims in China.

6. China has been most successful in handling Covid by offering (not commanding) a real vaccine to its people, and especially to those elderly who are vulnerable. That many elderly have been reluctant to take it has to do with Chinese traditions and suspicions due to the vaccine scandals in the West. And the reason the Chinese leadership didn't enforce vaccination was precisely because of the old Confucian tradition of respect for the elderly - which we in the West seem to have abandoned. The rigid Chinese lockdown was the will of Chinese people - not the "Communist dictatorship" as US/CIA steered media want us to believe. Against this background it's pathetic that Finland kicks out Confucian institutes because US ordered it to do so, but has no problem with islamist mosques and institutes paid by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. And to top it all, now China, as the first country in the world, has developed a recombinant human monoclonal antibody vaccine that fully protects against all variants; uses own human antibody cells; has no side-effects; is cheaper then Western vaccines; and can be taken as a nasal spray - i.e. directed precisely to the first barrier of defense, which then goes farther and kills the virus already in the lungs.

7. China, according to US research, is now by far the world leader when it comes to R&D. Abandoning ties with China will inevitably lead any country incl. Finland into backwardness in the near future.

8. The only way for US to stop China from developing even further and faster is to start a war. That's why US makes every effort to subvert Taiwan-China and mainland-China ties, by supporting the the anti-China party against the pro-China party in Taiwan, as well as militarizing Taiwan itself and the whole of the East Asian territory, and even pushing for NATO extension against China. Do you Snna Marin want to support Uncle Sam's own criminal interests and starting one more war initiated by US?!

9. So dear Sanna, why did you choose Uncle Sam's nukes while abandoning China?!

 And the alleged "authoritarian censorship" in China pales in comparison with the West, and should also be seen against the background of US/CIA's continuous efforts to subvert and destabilize China. Moreover, see how US and its puppets brutally faked and distorted information about the opthomologist doctor in Wuhan who wrongly put on the Chinese social media Weibu that Covid-19 was the much more dangerous original SARS virus. After an hour he realized his mistake, and according to the law (as in all Western countries) spreading such possibly dangerous rumors made it necessary for the hospital to report it to authorities. However, after a couple of days the police just asked him to explain and then told him not to do it again. And after that he could in peace continue his work at the hospital without any kind of sentence or fine etc. So how does this fact as well as the fact that he could say whatever he liked on Weibu fit an "authoritarian dictatorship"?! But in the West he was "a suppressed whisteblower silenced by the Communist dictaorship". Similarly, when the unhealthy and dement former Chinese leader Hu Jintao got worse during the long lasting congress and was helped out, the Western media and especially BBC, desperately tried to make readers and listeners belive the poor man was "silenced" by the "dictator" Xi. Same story with the mentally ill "whistleblower" woman, and the "batwoman" etc. etc. the list could go on.

Peter Klevius wrote:

Tuesday, November 01, 2022

Finnish politicians and "experts" lie about US' NATO nukes straight in the face of the Finnish people.

 When Newsweek rightly pointed out that 'Finland May* Allow NATO to Place Nuclear Weapons on Border With Russia' it just repeated what Peter Klevius warned for almost a year ago when Finnish politicians made the disastrous NATO decision without asking the Finns.

* In fact it's inevitable that if Finland really goes through with this, then the road for US nukes is wide open, no matter if the nukes are physically there before a conflict or not.
 

Peter Klevius translation: American (sic) magazine reported about Finland and nukes - Aaltola and Stubb snarled: 'Humbug' (this was in regard of Newsweek's article - which isn't "American" but a U.S. magazine).
 

At the heart of US' aggressive nuke policy is the B61-12 Life Extension Program with s.c. low-yield (Hiroshima+ size) ground penetrating nuclear warheads, tailored for stealth attacks with F-35b departing from countries close to Russian or Chinese borders.

According to the Helsinki-based newspaper Iltalehti, the bill regarding potential NATO membership the Finnish government will put before parliament doesn't include any opt-outs for nuclear weapons.

Speaking to the paper, defense sources said Finland's foreign and defense ministers, Pekka Haavisto and Antti Kaikkonen, gave a "commitment" to NATO in July that they wouldn't seek "restrictions or national reservations" if Helsinki's application is accepted.

However, now the same Iltalehti has the nerve to call this information a "fake", and pretends to excuse the move by writing that 'Finland hasn't asked for nukes'. Well, if you sign with the Devil which clearly wants to utilize your position as a border against Russia, and which has produced more than 600 "mininukes" tailored for exactly those 64 F-35 you were cheated to buy instead of the Swedish ones that had for long been the plan, then only a fool or a deliberate lier/cheater would argue as Iltalehti does.

Here's Iltalehti's nutty "defense" translated by Peter Klevius:

Iltalehti's article doesn't argue that NATO plans to bring nukes to Finland. The article deals with information according which the government's bill doesn't explicitly prohibit this.  

'Iltalehden artikkelissa ei väitetä Naton suunnittelevan ydinaseiden tuomista Suomeen. Artikkeli käsittelee tietoja, joiden mukaan hallituksen lakiesitys ei erikseen kiellä tätä.'

Peter Klevius: I rest my case! Rest in US nukes, Finland!